<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<issue_export_package generated_at="2026-06-02T17:20:14+00:00">
  <journal>
    <title>International Journal of Maritime Crime &amp; Security</title>
    <acronym>IJMCS</acronym>
    <issn_print>2631-3855</issn_print>
    <issn_online>2631-3863</issn_online>
    <doi_prefix>https://doi.org/10.24052/IJMCS/</doi_prefix>
  </journal>
  <issue>
    <id>105</id>
    <volume>Volume 03</volume>
    <name>Issue 01</name>
    <published_month>2023-08-01</published_month>
  </issue>
  <articles>
    <article>
      <id>42</id>
      <title>Editorial</title>
      <url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/details&amp;cid=42</url>
      <published_date>2023-08-31</published_date>
      <abstract></abstract>
      <references></references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/cdn/article_file/2023-09-08-12-21-24-PM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Professor Chris Bellamy</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords/>
      <metrics>
        <views>5299</views>
        <downloads>3</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>43</id>
      <title>Inhospitable Sea II. The Black Sea. the role of the Russian and Ukrainian navies and the widening war, October 2022 to mid-July 2023</title>
      <url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/details&amp;cid=43</url>
      <published_date>2023-08-31</published_date>
      <abstract></abstract>
      <references></references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/cdn/article_file/2023-09-08-12-18-31-PM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Professor Chris Bellamy</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords/>
      <metrics>
        <views>5329</views>
        <downloads>14</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>44</id>
      <title>The Role of International Law in the Maritime Migration Security Assemblage: EU Activity in the Lampedusa Triangle</title>
      <url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/details&amp;cid=44</url>
      <published_date>2023-08-31</published_date>
      <abstract>This paper concerns itself with the configuration of security at sea, arguing that its implementation is not solely within the security actor’s control. Rather, maritime security configurations are constructed as a result of intended and unintended actions and implications, melding security and insecurity together as a singular sphere of activity. Narrowing in on the specific case of migration governance, this paper investigates the role of international legal obligations and limitations for security actors at sea in understanding the operationalisation of maritime migration security. Questions of the construction of maritime security configurations are considered with reference to boarding and searching of vessels, search and rescue (SAR) and access to territorial waters, perceived through the practice based assemblage approach. It is proposed that assemblage theory is suited to accessing complex relationships between security and international law. Attending to Central Mediterranean migration governance, this paper reflects a reading of international law that resulted in a stagnation of security on the high seas. The convictions of this paper are three-fold. Firstly and primarily, the implementation of a maritime security initiative is not solely within the control of the securitising actor. Secondly, maritime security configurations are malleable, and shaped by unplanned elements, including international legal obligations and instruments. Finally, maritime security is an assemblage, constructed as a result of intentional and unintentional independent elements which form relationships and result in a unique security configuration. The findings demonstrate that international law forms an important aspect of maritime migration security configurations or assemblages, and significantly shapes such operations.</abstract>
      <references>Abrahamsen, R. and Williams, M. C. (2009). Security Beyond the State: Global Security Assemblages in International Politics. International Political Sociology 3(1), pp.1–17. Adler, E., and Barnett M. N. (1998) Security Communities in Theoretical Perspective. In: Adler, E. and Barnett, M. N. (eds.) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.3-28. Adler, E. (2008). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14(2), pp.195-230. Albahari, M. (2016). After The Shipwreck: Mourning and Citizenship in the Mediterranean, Our Sea. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 83(2), pp.275-294. Alim, M.A. (2021). Climate change and its challenges for the marine environment with special reference to ecological aspects in Bangladesh. International Journal of Maritime Crime and Security, 02(01), pp.32-47. Amnesty International (2020). Disembark Asylum-Seekers Held on to Ferry Boats. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org.uk/urgent-actions/disembark-asylum-seekers-held-ferry-boats. Asderaki, F. and Markozani, E. (2021). The Securitization of Migration and the 2015 Refugee Crisis: From Words to Actions. The New Eastern Mediterranean Transformed, pp.179-198. Berling, T. V. (2012). Bourdieu, International Relations, and European Security. Theory and Society, 41(5), pp.451–478. Bevilacqua, G. (2017). Exploring The Ambiguity of Operation Sophia Between Military and Search and Rescue Activities. The Future of The Law of The Sea, pp.165-189. Bicchi, F. (2022). Communities of practice and what they can do for International Relations. Review of International Studies, 48(1), pp.24-43. Boşilcă, R. L., Ferreira, S., &amp; Ryan, B.J. (Eds.). (2022). Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security (1st ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge. Bourdieu P., (1972), Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique, Paris: Seuil; new edition 2000. (Revised and modified translation: Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977). Bousquet, A. (2014). Welcome to the Machine: Rethinking Technology and Society through Assemblage Theory. In: Acuto, M., Curtis, S. (eds) Reassembling International Theory. London: Palgrave Pivot. Bremberg, N., Sonnsjö, H. and Mobjörk, M. (2019). The EU and climate-related security risks: a community of practice in the making? Journal of European Integration, 41(5), pp.623-639 Broohm, D. (2021). Maritime Security Governance: A New Strategy Management to Avoid Piracy in the Gog and its Legal Guarantee. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(10), pp.405-437. Bueger, C. (2012). Drops in the bucket: A review of onshore responses to Somali piracy. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15(1), pp.15–31. Bueger, C. (2014). Thinking assembling methodologically: Some rules of thumb. In: Acuto, M. &amp; Curtis, S. (Eds.), Reassembling international theory: Assemblage thinking and international relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 58–66. Bueger, C. (2015a). What is maritime security? Marine Policy, 53, pp.159-164. Bueger, C. (2015b). Learning from piracy: future challenges of maritime security governance. Global Affairs, 1(1), pp.33-42. Bueger C. and Gadinger, F. (2018). International Practice Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Bueger, C., Edmunds, T. and McCabe, R. (2020a). Into the sea: capacity-building innovations and the maritime security challenge. Third World Quarterly, 41(2), pp.228-246. Bueger, C., Edmunds, T. and McCabe, R. (2020b). Maritime Security, Capacity Building, and the Western Indian Ocean. Capacity Building for Maritime Security, pp.3-20. Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Carvalho, B. d., &amp; Leira, H. (2022). Sea and International Relations. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Cook, P. (2020). Comment: The emerging spectrum of maritime security. International Journal of Maritime Crime and Security, 01(01), pp. 50-55. Cuttitta, P. (2017). Repoliticization Through Search and Rescue? Humanitarian NGOs and Migration Management in the Central Mediterranean. Geopolitics, pp.1-29. DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (2008). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi, London: Continuum. Diez, T. and Squire, V. (2008). Traditions of citizenship and the securitisation of migration in Germany and Britain. Citizenship Studies, 12(6), pp.565-581. Duxbury, S.W. and Haynie, D.L. (2019). Criminal Network Security: An agent‐based approach to Evaluating Network Resilience. Criminology, 57(2), pp.314–342. EEAS (2016). EUNAVFOR MED – Operation sophia – Six Monthly Report: June 22nd to December 31st’, 5653/16, 28 January 2016. Enns, C., Andrews, N. and Grant, A. (2020). Security for whom? Analysing hybrid security governance in Africa's extractive sectors. International Affairs, 96(4), pp.995–1013. European Defence Agency (EDA) (2014). European maritime surveillance network reaches operational status. Available at: https://eda.europa.eu/news-and-events/news/2014/10/27/european-maritime-surveillance-network-reaches-operational-status. European Defence Agency (EDA) (2021). Annual Report 2021. Available at: https://eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/brochures/eda-annual-report-2021.pdf. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (EUFRA) (2022). June 2022 Update – Search and Rescue (SAR) operations in the Mediterranean and fundamental rights. Available at: https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2022/june-2022-update-ngo-ships-sar-activities.  Council of the European Union (2015). COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/778 of 18 May 2015 on a European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED). Council of the European Union (2020), Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/472 of 31 March 2020 on a European Union Military Operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI). European Parliament (2022). Briefing: Search and rescue efforts for Mediterranean migrants. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/733712/EPRS_BRI(2022)733712_EN.pdf Fakhoury, T. (2016). Securitising Migration: The European Union in the Context of the Post-2011 Arab Upheavals. The International Spectator, 51(4), pp.67-79. Gabrielli, L. (2014). Securitization of migration and human rights: Frictions at the southern EU borders and beyond. Urban People/Lidé Města. 16(2), pp.311–322. Garelli, G. And Tazzioli, M. (2017). The Humanitarian War Against Migrant Smugglers at Sea. Antipode, pp.1-19. Gayle, D. (2015, Apr 15). Hundreds of migrants believed to have drowned off Libya after boat capsizes. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/14/400-drowned-libya-italy-migrant-boat-capsizes. Germond, B., Mazaris, A.D. (2019). Climate Change and Maritime Security. Marine Policy, 99, pp.262–266. Goldewijk, K. (2018). Border Security, Boat Migration and Mediterranean Operations in the Frames of Securitisation and Law Enforcement: Causal Explanation and Process Tracing. In: Monsuur, H., Jansen, J., and Marchal, F. (eds.), NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2018. NL ARMS. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. Huysmans, J. (1995). Migrants as a Security Problem: Dangers of 'Securitizing' Societal Issues. In: Miles, R. and Thränhardt, D. (eds.). Migration and European Integration. The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion. London: Pinter, pp.53-72. Hanke, P., Wieruszewski, M. And Panizzon, M. (2018). The ‘Spirit of the Schengen Rules’, The Humanitarian Visa, And Contested Asylum Governance In Europe – The Swiss Case. Journal Of Ethnic and Migration Studies, pp.1-16. House of Lords (2017). Operation Sophia: a failed mission: Summary of conclusions and recommendations. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldeucom/5/509.htm. HRW (2022). EU: Frontex Complicit in Abuse in Libya. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/12/12/eu-frontex-complicit-abuse-libya International Maritime Organization (IMO), (1974). International Convention for the Safety of Life At Sea, 1 November 1974. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (1979). International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue, 27 April 1979. International Organization for Migration (IOM) (2015). IOM Calls for International Investigation of Mediterranean Shipwreck Deaths. Available at: https://www.iom.int/news/iom-calls-international-investigation-mediterranean-shipwreck-deaths Jacobsen, K.L. and Larsen, J. (2019). Piracy studies coming of age: a window on the making of maritime intervention actors. International Affairs, 95(5), pp.1037–1054. Jamieson, T. (2018). Securitization Theory Toward a Replicable Framework for Analysis. In: James, P., Bertucci, M. and Hayes, J. (eds.) Constructivism Reconsidered: Past, Present, and Future. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp.155-180. Karyotis, G. and Patrikios, S. (2010). Religion, Securitization and Anti-Immigration Attitudes: The Case of Greece. Journal of Peace Research, 47(1), pp.43–57. Kustermans, J. (2015). Parsing the practice turn: Practice, practical knowledge, practices. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(2), pp.175–196. Larsen, J. (2022). Global Political Ethnography: A Methodological Approach to Studying Maritime Security Governance. In: Boşilcă, R. L., Ferreira, S., and Ryan, B.J. (eds.). (2022). Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security (1st ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge. Larsen, J. (2023). Counter-Piracy Law in Practice: An Ethnography of International Security Governance. Oxfordshire: Routledge. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Lemberg-Pedersen, M. (2018). Security, industry, and migration in European border control. In: Weinar, A., Bonjour, S. and Zhyznomirska, L. (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the politics of migration in Europe. Oxfordshire: Routledge International Handbooks. Léonard, S. &amp; Kaunert, C (2022). The securitisation of migration in the European Union: Frontex and its evolving security practices. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(6), pp.1417-1429. McDonald M. (2008). Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), pp.563-587. Moreno-Lax, V. (2017). The EU Humanitarian Border And The Securitization Of Human Rights: The ‘Rescue-Through-Interdiction/Rescue-Without-Protection’ Paradigm. JCMS: Journal Of Common Market Studies, 56(1), pp.119-140. Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and Actor-Networks: Rethinking Socio-Material Power, Politics and Space. Geography Compass, 9(1), pp.27-41. Patalano, A. (2015). Nightmare Nostrum? Not Quite. The RUSI Journal, 160(3), pp.14-19. Ryan, B. (2022). Maritime Security in a Critical Context. In: Boşilcă, R. L., Ferreira, S., &amp; Ryan, B.J. (eds.). (2022). Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security (1st ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge. Sperling, J. and Webber, M. (2019). The European Union: security governance and collective securitisation. West European Politics, 42(2), pp.228-260. Stevens, C. (2020). Assembling cybersecurity: The politics and materiality of technical malware reports and the case of Stuxnet. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(1), pp.129-152. Stierl, M. (2017). A Fleet of Mediterranean Border Humanitarians. Antipode, 50, pp.704-724. Svanberg, K. (2020). The use of private maritime guards as an innovative means to fulfil the state’s duty to cooperate in the repression of maritime piracy. par 1. International Journal of Maritime Crime and Security, 01(02), pp.31-53. Svanberg, K. (2021). The use of private maritime guards as an innovative means to fulfil states’ duty to cooperate in the repression of maritime piracy. part Two. International Journal of Maritime Crime and Security, 02(01), pp.6-31. Toaldo, M. (2015). Migrations Through and From Libya: A Mediterranean Challenge. In: Kamel, L. (ed.), Changing Migration Patterns in the Mediterranean. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), pp75–96. Trevisanut, S. (2014). The Principle of Non-Refoulement and the De-Territorialization of Border Control at Sea. Leiden Journal of International Law, 27(03), Pp.661-675. United Nations (1945). Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945. UN General Assembly (1982). Convention on the Law of the Sea, 10 December 1982. UN General Assembly (2000a). Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, Supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, 15 November 2000. UN General Assembly (2000b). Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, 15 November 2000. UN General Assembly (2001). United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, 8 January 2001. UN Security Council (2015a). Security Council Resolution 2240 (2015) [on migrant smuggling and human trafficking into, through and from the Libyan territory and off the coast of Libya], 14 October 2015, S/RES/2240. UN Security Council (2015b). Doc. S/PV.7531. Meeting of 9 Oct 2015. UN Security Council (2015c). Security Council Resolution 2259 (2015) [on the situation in Libya], 23 December 2015, S/RES/2259. Van de Kerke, T. W. &amp; Hijzen, C. W. (2021). Secrecy, evidence, and fear: exploring the construction of intelligence power with Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Intelligence and National Security, 36(4), pp.527-540. Wæver, O., Buzan, B., Kelstrup, M., Lemaitre, P. and Carlton, D. et al. (1993) Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. London: Pinter. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Westcott, T. (2023). Anti-migrant stance puts shipping at risk with growing need to rescue migrants. https://theloadstar.com/anti-migrant-stance-puts-shipping-at-risk-from-growing-need-to-rescue-migrants/. Zoubir, Y. (2020). The Protracted Civil War in Libya: The Role of Outside Powers. Insight Turkey, 22(4), pp.11-27.</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/cdn/article_file/2023-09-21-11-19-20-AM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Charlie Pearson</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>Assemblage</keyword>
        <keyword>EU Security</keyword>
        <keyword>Maritime Security</keyword>
        <keyword>Migration Governance</keyword>
        <keyword>Practice Theory</keyword>
        <keyword>Zonation</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>6633</views>
        <downloads>34</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>45</id>
      <title>Maritime Security: Lost in Translation? Developing a Common Lexicon to Enhance Data Integrity and Global Maritime Domain Awareness</title>
      <url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/details&amp;cid=45</url>
      <published_date>2023-08-31</published_date>
      <abstract>With the proliferation of post-Cold War globalisation, the international community began to appreciate the immense importance of maritime security. In recent decades, numerous national, regional, and global information sharing centres have been established with an aim to provide relevant stakeholders with an assessment of the risks and threats within the maritime domain. Unfortunately, international organisations failed to simultaneously emphasise the importance of standardised terminology and definitions for use in the global maritime security context. Instead of using other standardised areas of the maritime industry such as maritime safety as a guide, dozens of government agencies, regional reporting centres, private maritime security companies, and information sharing/fusion centres have now been established. Each of these uses its own unique categories, terminology, and definitions to measure and catalogue regional and global incidents of violent maritime crime. In this article, that includes acts of piracy and armed robbery against ships. In some cases, political and economic bias has played a significant role in how maritime security incident data is officially recorded and presented to the public. This lack of data cohesion has resulted in significant confusion and distrust amongst the shipping industry and policymakers. It has also created an uncertain environment for seafarers, who largely depend on their employers and regulators to keep them safe and secure at sea. The research includes an analysis of several sets of qualitative and quantitative data from prominent agencies and reporting centres. Case studies are also presented to illustrate why harmonised terminology, definitions, and incident reporting protocols are integral to achieving global maritime domain awareness. The numerous challenges to achieving this goal are then explored and proposed solutions are presented. The paper concludes by proposing a lexicon for incidents of violent maritime crime, as a first step in creating a common lexicon for global maritime security. As stated in earlier issues, this journal does not seek to promote a common definition of maritime security, but a common lexicon is of more practical use. This article is based on a dissertation completed as part of the master’s degree in Maritime Security at Coventry University in 2022.</abstract>
      <references>Ahmmed, R. (2018). The Approaches of Teaching and Learning Maritime English: Some Factors to Consider. . Bangladesh Maritime Journal, September. http://www.bsmrmu.edu.bd/journal-bmj/assets/pdf/vol-2-issue-1/bmj-02-01-08.pdf Aminah, &amp; Refnaldi. (2020). Students’ Needs on Maritime English Learning Material: A Case at Vocational High Schools. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 411(Icoelt 2019), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.041 Andreas, P., &amp; Greenhill, K. M. (2010). The Politics of Numbers in Global Crime and Conflict. Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7zg8b.15 Astratinei, C. (2016). Communication Problems in a Mixed Crew Environment. Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy, 19(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.21279/1454-864x-16-i1-002 Bateman, S. (2007). UNCLOS and its limitations as the foundation for a regional maritime security regime. Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 19(3), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10163270709464140 Bellamy, C. (2020). What are maritime crime and maritime security? International Journal of Maritime Crime and Security, 01(01), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.24052/ijmcs/v01is01/art-2 BIMCO, ICS, IFSMA, IGP&amp;I, INTERTANKO, INTERCARGO, &amp; OCIMF. (2018). Global counter piracy guidance for companies, masters and seafarers (1st ed.). Witherby’s. BIMCO, ICS, IGP&amp;I, INTERTANKO, &amp; OCIMF. (2018). Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy and Enhance Maritime Security in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea (BMP5) (5th ed.). Witherby’s. https://www.maritimeglobalsecurity.org/media/1037/bmp5-low_res.pdf Bueger, C. (2015a). From dusk to dawn? Maritime domain awareness in Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 37(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs37-2a Bueger, C. (2015b). What is Maritime Security? Marine Policy, 53, 159–164. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0308597X14003327?token=1011A5FC48F2DD5D5282B9BF641342ED1EB4C4A65CEA0B080E1E1E246EEEF7950F6E20E9CDE12890F4E9F443F5FDC75B&amp;originRegion=us-east-1&amp;originCreation=20211126005221 Bueger, C. (2021). Does Maritime Security Require a New United Nations Structure? IPI Global Observatory. https://theglobalobservatory.org/2021/08/does-maritime-security-require-a-new-united-nations-structure/ Bueger, C., &amp; Edmunds, T. (2017). Beyond seablindness: A new agenda for maritime security studies. International Affairs, 93(6), 1293–1311. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix174 Bueger, C., &amp; Edmunds, T. (2020). Blue crime: Conceptualising transnational organised crime at sea. Marine Policy, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104067 Bueger, C., &amp; Edmunds, T. (2021). Pragmatic ordering: Informality, experimentation, and the maritime security agenda. Review of International Studies, 47(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210520000479 Bueger, C., Edmunds, T., &amp; McCabe, R. (2020). Into the sea: capacity-building innovations and the maritime security challenge. Third World Quarterly, 41(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1660632 Chambers, S. (2020, August 3). Details emerge of how a disgruntled armed guard took control of an Eagle Bulk supramax for three days. Splash247. https://splash247.com/details-emerge-of-how-a-disgruntled-armed-guard-took-control-of-an-eagle-bulk-supramax-for-three-days/ Chapsos, I. (2016). Is maritime security a traditional security challenge? In Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications (pp. 59–78). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27914-5_4 Churchill, R. (2012). Compliance mechanisms in the Law of the Sea: from the individual to the collective. In Holger P. Hestermeyer ; Doris Konig ; Nele Matz-Luck ; Volker Roben ; Anja Seibert-Fohr ; Peter Tobias Stoll ; Silja Voneky (Ed.), Coexistence, cooperation and solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum (pp. 777–806). Martinus Nijhoff. Cook, P. (2020). Comment: The emerging spectrum of maritime security. International Journal of Maritime Crime and Security, 01(01), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.24052/ijmcs/v01is01/art-5 Curt, E., Huggins, J., &amp; Pegg, R. (2020). IMO Working Group to Harmonize Definitions and Reporting. Shared Awareness and Deconfliction (SHADE) 47. Deves, K., &amp; Post, W. (2013). Maritime Piracy Incident Reporting A Technical Feasibility Study Application of the ECCAIRS Reporting System into the domain of maritime piracy. https://doi.org/10.2788/82759 Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2018). The Need Analysis of Maritime English Learning Materials for Nautical Students of Maritime Academy in Indonesia Based on STCW’2010 Curriculum. English Language Teaching, 11(9), 41. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p41 EU NAVFOR ATALANTA. (2022). Understanding Evolving Threats in the Western Indian Ocean and the Gulf of Aden Operations. Djibouti Code of Conduct - Jeddah Agreement High-Level Meeting. European Commission. (2014). EU Maritime Security Strategy. Fan, L., Fei, J., Schriever, U., &amp; Fan, S. (2017). The communicative competence of Chinese seafarers and their employability in the international maritime labour market. Marine Policy, 83(May), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.035 Flynn, B. (2022). Non-state and Hybrid Actorness at Sea: From Narco-Subs to Drone Patrols. Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security, 287–298. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001324-27 Franceschi, D. (2014). The Features of Maritime English Discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p78 Fransas, A., Nieminen, E., Salokorpi, M., &amp; Rytkönen, J. (2021). Maritime safety and security. In Maritime safety and security: Literature Review. Kymenlaakso University of Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367822729-5 García Pérez, R. (2022). THE LIBERAL APPROACH TO MARITIME SECURITY. In Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security (pp. 62–72). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001324-7 Germond, B. (2015). Geopolitics of Seapower. In The Maritime Dimension of European Security : Seapower and the European Union (pp. 19–32). http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/coventry/detail.action?docID=4000732. Gesami, B. (2021). MARITIME SECURITY THREATS IN AFRICA. Academia Letters, Sep 2021, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3564 Goward, D. A. (2008). Maritime Domain Awareness: The key to maritime security. Center for Oceans Law and Policy, 12(April 2007), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004164277.v-594.75 Hawkes, K. G. (1989). Maritime Security. Cornell Maritime Press. Huggins, J., &amp; Vestergaard Madsen, J. (2014). The CGPCS: the evolution of multilateralism to multi-stakeholder collaboration. Fighting Piracy off the Coast of Somalia. Lessons Learned from the Contact Group, 18–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep07079.6.pdf ICC-GoG. (2022). ICC-GoG quarterly report on maritime safety and security in the Gulf of Guinea (Issue Edition/N°01/2022). www.icc-gog.org ICC-IMB. (2020). ICC-IMB Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships Report 2020 (Issue April). ICC IMB-PRC. (2021). ICC International Maritime Bureau - Piracy and Armed Robbery Againt Ships - Annual Report 2021. IFC-IOR. (2022). IFC-IOR Annual Report 2021. In A. Dhiman, P. A. Varma, C. Parks, &amp; D. Kanjiraparambil (Eds.), Information Fusion Centre - Indian Ocean Region. IMO. (2013). IMO What it is. In IMO - What it is (p. 72). International Maritime Organization. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/About/Documents/What it is Oct 2013_Web.pdf IMO Assembly. (2002). IMO STANDARD MARINE COMMUNICATION PHRASES. In Resolution A.918(22): Vol. A 22/Res.9 (Issue January). IMO Assembly. (2008). Adoption of the code of the international standards and recommended practices for a safety investigation into a marine casualty or marine incident (Casualty Investigation Code). IMO Resolution MSC.255(84). IMO Assembly. (2010). Resolution A.1025(26) - CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF CRIMES OF PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS. CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF CRIMES OF PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS, 1–8. IMO MSC. (1986). MEASURES TO PREVENT UNLAWFUL ACTS AGAINST PASSENGERS AND CREWS ON BOARD SHIPS. MSC/Circ.443. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Security/Documents/MSC.Circ.443.pdf IMO MSC. (2009). GUIDANCE TO SHIPOWNERS, COMPANIES, SHIP OPERATORS, SHIPMASTERS AND CREWS ON PREVENTING AND SUPPRESSING ACTS OF PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS. MSC.1/Circ.1334. IMO MSC. (2015). RECOMMENDATIONS TO GOVERNMENTS FOR PREVENTING AND SUPPRESSING PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS. MSC.1/Circ.1333/Rev.1. IMO MSC. (2019). Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on its 101st Session. 103. International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2019). Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf. https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/SUA-Treaties.aspx International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2022). MSC.4/Circ.266 - REPORTS ON ACTS OF PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS. In Maritime Security and Piracy (Issue April). Jacobsen, K. L. (2019). Poly-criminal Pirates and Ballooning Effects: Implications for International Counter-piracy. Global Policy, 10(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12636 Jacobsen, K. L. (2022). THE POLITICS OF PIRACY NUMBERS : THE GULF OF GUINEA CASE. In Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security (1st ed., pp. 127–138). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001324-13 Klein, N. (2011a). International Law of Maritime Security: A Synopsis and Proposal for Change. Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea, 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566532.003.0007 Klein, N. (2011b). Two Fundamental Concepts. In Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea (pp. 1–23). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566532.003.0001 Lombardo, N. D. (2014). Underreporting Of Crimes At Sea Reasons, Consequences, And Potential Solutions (Issue November). http://oceansbeyondpiracy.org/sites/default/files/attachments/Underreporting.pdf Lutz, F., Roel, D. P., &amp; D. Thiele, R. (2013). Maritime Security – Perspectives for a Comprehensive Approach. ISPSW Strategy Series: Focus on Defense and International Security, 49(222), 1–25. Maritime Domain Awareness for Trade - Gulf of Guinea. (2021a). Biannual Report 2021 part 1 (Issue December). https://gog-mdat.org/reports Maritime Domain Awareness for Trade - Gulf of Guinea. (2021b). Biannual Report 2021 part 2 (Issue December). https://gog-mdat.org/reports Marshall Islands. (2022). Ship Security Advisory 05-22. Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator. https://www.register-iri.com/wp-content/uploads/SSA-2022-05.pdf Marshall Islands, BIMCO, ICC, IFSMA, INTERTANKO, INTERCARGO, &amp; OCIMF. (2019). Standardized reporting of global piracy and armed robbery incidents. MSC 101/18/2, 1, 1–64. Mccabe, R. C. (2018). Modern Maritime Piracy. Routledge. Mejia, M. (2003). Maritime Gerrymandering: Dilemmas in Defining Piracy, Terrorism and other Acts of Maritime Violence. Journal of International Commercial Law, 2(2), 153–175. Mitchell, V. (2020). Global challenges in maritime security: an introduction. In L. Otto (Ed.), Global Challenges in Maritime Security (pp. 111–126). Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2020.1809368 Mitchell, V. (2022). State Cooperation for Maritime Security in the Gulf of Guinea. Power and the Maritime Domain, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003298984-13 Nguyen, L. N. (2018). The UNCLOS Dispute Settlement System: What Role Can It Play in Resolving Maritime Disputes in Asia? Asian Journal of International Law, 8(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204425131600031X Okafor-Yarwood, I. (2020). The Cyclical Nature of Maritime Security Threats: Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing as a Threat to Human and National Security in the Gulf of Guinea. African Security, 13(2), 116–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2020.1724432 Otto, L. (2020). Global challenges in maritime security: an introduction. In L. Otto (Ed.), Introducing Maritime Security: The Sea as a Geostrategic Space. In: Otto, L. (eds) Global Challenges in Maritime Security. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. (Issue 1, pp. 1–11). Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2020.1809368 Pulungan, R. W. (2021). Enhancing Maritime Security in the Malacca Strait: Cooperation Against Piracy and Maritime Terrorism. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol7.2.220 Rahman, C. (2009). Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand Concepts of Maritime Security A strategic perspective on alternative visions for good order and security at sea, with policy implications for New Zealand. The Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand, Discussion Papers, 07. http://www.vuw.ac.nz/css/ ReCAAP. (2020). Annual Report Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships in Asia 2019 (Issue December). https://www.rtda.gov.rw/fileadmin/templates/publications/RWANDA_Annual_Report_2018-2019_SHARING.pdf, ReCAAP ISC. (2021). ReCAAP Annual Report 2021. In ReCAAP Annual Report 2021. https://www.rtda.gov.rw/fileadmin/templates/publications/RWANDA_Annual_Report_2018-2019_SHARING.pdf, ReCAAP Webpage. (n.d.). About Us. ReCAAP Website. Retrieved November 8, 2022, from https://www.recaap.org/about_ReCAAP-ISC Rosedi, S. R. M. (2013). THE ROLES OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN MERCHANT SHIPPING ’ S COMMUNICATION : THE TRAINING NEEDS OF DECK WATCHKEEPING OFFICERS THE ROLES OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN MERCHANT SHIPPING ’ S COMMUNICATION : THE TRAINING NEEDS OF DECK WATCHKEEPING OFFICERS Shamsul Rizal b. November. Ryan, B. J. (2022). Maritime Security in a Critical Context 1. In Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security (pp. 27–37). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001324-4 Shemella, P., Bogle, A., Chalk, P., Cline, L., Doorey, T., Gunaratna, R., Mockaitis, T., Petroni, J., Reinhardt, C., &amp; Schoultz, R. (2016). Global Responses to Maritime Violence: Cooperation and Collective Action (P. Shemella (ed.)). Stanford Security Studies; Stanford University Press. Sia, T., &amp; Said, M. H. (2018). The Importance of Maritime English Proficiency in Others Marine Related Undergraduate Programs. January. https://doi.org/10.23977/msmi.2018.82633 Slaughter, A.-M., &amp; Hale, T. (2011). International Relations, Principal Theories. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2011th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e722 Tanaka, Y. (2012). The international law of the sea (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071844309419508 The Maritime Executive. (2015, June 10). Chronic Under-Reporting of Piracy. The Maritime Executive. https://maritime-executive.com/article/chronic-under-reporting-of-piracy U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2005). National Strategy for Maritime Security: Maritime Commerce Security Plan. U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). (2022). Worldwide Threat to Shipping (WTS) Report (Issues 05 Oct-02 Nov). extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.oni.navy.mil/Portals/12/Intel agencies/piracy/WTS/20221102 WTS.pdf?ver=JeY7xn-1Qnl_267n_KsEBg%3D%3D UN General Assembly. (2008). Oceans and the Law of the Sea: Report of the Secretary-General A/63/63: Vol. A/63/63 (Issue March). extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/266/26/PDF/N0826626.pdf?OpenElement UN Security Council. (2008). Security council. Resolution 1816. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300019251 United Kingdom Maritime Trade Organisation (UKMTO). (2022). UKMTO Quarterly Maritime Security Report - Q3 2022 - Jul-Sep. United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. In United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). Maritime Crime: a Manual for Criminal Justice Practitioners. https://www.unodc.org/documents/ropan/2021/GMCP_Maritime_3rd_edition_Ebook.pdf Vestergaard Madsen, J., Seyle, C., Brandt, K., Purser, B., Randall, H., &amp; Roy, K. (2013). The State of Maritime Piracy. Walker, G. K., &amp; Noyes, J. E. (2002). Law of the Sea Convention. California Western International Law Journal, 32(2), 343–386. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203553565</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/cdn/article_file/2023-09-21-11-19-48-AM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Evan Curt</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords/>
      <metrics>
        <views>7014</views>
        <downloads>55</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>46</id>
      <title>“UNCTAD RMT 2022”</title>
      <url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/details&amp;cid=46</url>
      <published_date>2023-08-31</published_date>
      <abstract></abstract>
      <references></references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/cdn/article_file/2023-09-08-14-37-05-PM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors/>
      <keywords/>
      <metrics>
        <views>5551</views>
        <downloads>3</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>47</id>
      <title>“Maritime Crime and Policing”</title>
      <url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/details&amp;cid=47</url>
      <published_date>2023-08-31</published_date>
      <abstract></abstract>
      <references></references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/cdn/article_file/2023-09-08-12-24-58-PM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Yarin Eski and Martin Wright</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords/>
      <metrics>
        <views>5591</views>
        <downloads>20</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>48</id>
      <title>“Atlantic Piracy in the Early Nineteenth Century: The Shocking Story of the Pirates and the Survivors of the Morning Star”</title>
      <url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/details&amp;cid=48</url>
      <published_date>2023-08-31</published_date>
      <abstract></abstract>
      <references></references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijmcs.co.uk/cdn/article_file/2023-09-08-14-35-22-PM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Sarah Craze</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords/>
      <metrics>
        <views>5518</views>
        <downloads>5</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
  </articles>
</issue_export_package>
